ZIMBABWE: WHERE IS THE COUP?

Zimbabwe is on the lips of many across the globe and the word COUP is being thrown around left, right, centre and all the way in between. I agree that a coup did take place in Zimbabwe but it was not instigated by the military. A coup was acted out by Grace Mugabe who unconstitutionally assumed a seat in the presidium and began to interfere in the running of government affairs leading to a rapid and glaring decapitation of what the State stands for. What the military did was to simply stop that coup in its tracks.

If it is a matter of semantics then it is important to stick to the fundamentals and facts in their entirety without isolating the acute event in focus. It appears most analysts and ilk agree on the definition of a coup as ‘the sudden takeover of power through unconstitutional means’. It becomes apparent that concluding that a coup has taken place in a said country can only be reached after taking into consideration what the Constitution of the land in question says about where power should lie, how it should be used and how it should be transferred. If one were to labour through all one hundred and fifty one (151) pages of The Constitution of The Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013 one would realise that there is not a single line that gives any semblance of State or Government power to the spouse of the Head of Government and State. In actual fact the word ‘First Lady’ does not even appear in the Constitution.

Since the year 2014, for the past three years, Grace Mugabe the spouse of the Head of Government and State had been acting in the capacity of a member of the Presidium without formal appointment or public declaration by the President as enshrined by the Constitution. It is indeed on public record that Grace Mugabe imposed herself into the helms of Government by justifying her utterances, actions and interference on the grounds of physical proximity to the Head of Government. To be specific, she went as far as claiming that she had power to intrude in State affairs because she cooked for the President. Is that a logical explanation? What that then means is that even the cook, gardener, bodyguard, sons, daughter and urinary catheter nurse at the beckoning of the President also had a stake in Government by mere constant proximity to the President!

It is also important to take cognisance of the fact that the President himself was over and over and over again warned by the Security branch of the State that the First Lady’s intrusion into State affairs posed a serious security risk to the stability of the nation. These warnings fell on deaf ears for three whole years. The President took this constitutional advice as an offence to his person and chose to seek retribution against the security service chiefs by firing them one by one. Logically the head of Intelligence had to be the first to go hence his re-assignment to the Justice Ministry. Next to go was the Chairman of the Joint Operations Command who also doubled as the State and Government Vice-President. The remaining members of the Joint Operations Command who had repeatedly deliberated on the contentious state security risk posed by the First Lady were also threatened with expulsion for the sole crime of voicing this obvious and justified concern. They were then left with only two choices; either to throw the Constitution out of the window and allow the coup by the First Lady to continue or to unite among themselves and save the Constitution in its entirety. They chose the latter and that is how we arrived at where we are.

The question we need to then ask ourselves is where exactly in the Constitution is a military intervention justified? At first reading it may be concluded that the Army Generals contravened Section 208 Subsections 2(a) and 2(b) which prohibit them from acting in a partisan manner and furthering the interests of any political party respectively but like I said before this argument is incomplete without taking the whole Constitution in context. For instance it should be acknowledged that they were also acting out of provocation from the ZANU-PF party youth who had announced themselves as a military arm of the nation which is contrary to Section 211 (2) which clearly states that “The Defence Forces are the only lawful military forces in Zimbabwe.” It is of utmost importance that a close reading of the very first sentence of Chapter 11 be made. Section 206 (1) clearly states that, “The national security objectives of Zimbabwe must reflect the resolve of Zimbabweans to live as equals in liberty, peace and harmony, free from fear, and in prosperity.” It is my humble belief that this is the key clause on whose grounds the military felt justified to act.

The “resolve of Zimbabweans” is a subjective term that can be reasonably quantified by a collation of sentiments bt Zimbabweans about any military action undertaken in protection of national security. What all this means is that the fundamental question is ‘How do Zimbabweans feel about the military intervention?’ I am sure a speak for the majority of Zimbabweans when I bravely conclude that what the military has done is congruent with and reinforces our own resolve to remove Robert Gabriel Mugabe as President of the Republic of Zimbabwe.

 

Advertisements

BOOK REVIEW: Dusklands by John Maxwell Coetzee

ZIMBABWE READER

This was the first book that the South African Nobel Laureate in Literature (2003) wrote. It is a tragedy that this beautiful work of art has by and large been ignored in favour of the author’s later works such as Life and Times of Michael K and Disgrace for which he won the Booker Prize in 1983 and 1999 respectively. J.M. Coetzee has been described by many as the most decorated author alive and I must admit the title befits his talent.

Dusklands is actually a compendium of two novellas; The Vietnam Project and TheNarrative of Jacobus Coetzee. I should state right from the onset that I found the former intriguing and latter outright racist. The two novellas have disparate themes and plots but they share the author’s ingenuity in their delivery and literary contour. I wish to review the former and ignore the latter which I honestly…

View original post 276 more words

URGENT WARNING FOR ALL ZIMBABWEANS

Homework for every Zimbabwean citizen (Do not ask anyone for answers or copy anyone)

1. True or False: 85% of Zimbabweans are Christians.
2. True or False: The signs of the End-Times mentioned by Jesus Christ are now happening.
3. True or False: A nuclear war is about to break out on the Korean Peninsula.
4. True or False: Zimbabwe does not have nuclear weapons.
5. True or False: Our Army cannot sustain a nuclear attack.
6. True or False: South Africa is the only country in Southern Africa with nuclear capability.
7. True or False: There are at least 82 species of “Aliens” that have visited Earth in the past 500 years.
8. True or False: A Former Defence Minister of the Canadian Government warned the whole world that the world’s superpowers are hiding the biggest secret the world has never known; THAT WE ARE NOT ALONE AND OUR VISITORS have set up base in the South Pole in Antarctica.
9. True or False: Antarctica is the only continent in the world without a country. (Whose country is it?)
10. True or False: If you either die of a stray missile, an Islamic terrorist attack or death by hunger (when World War 3 breaks out all donor funding will go to war funds) where will you go?
11. True or False: Jesus Christ said when the signs of the End-Times begin it means He will be coming ‘like a thief in the night’

Answer these questions for yourself and it will change your perspective of what is really important in your life AT THIS VERY SECOND. Now compare these REAL THREATS TO YOUR PERSONAL LIFE with what we as Zimbabweans are currently focusing all our attention on.

Iwe muZimbabwean ARE YOU PREPARED?

WHY MUGABE WILL WIN IN 2018: A Prophecy by History.

At the base of the continent of Africa is a little tea pot-shaped country that goes by the name Zimbabwe. She was born on a Friday, the exact date being the 18th day of the month of April approximately three decades ago, in the year 1980. The same geographical tract of land was previously known as Rhodesia, a country run by imperialistic and racist Caucasians who broke away from Great Britain in 1965 after unilaterally declaring independence from the clutches of the Queen of England. Zimbabwe’s independence (the second independence of 1980) brought to a halt a protracted war between the white Rhodesians and the black guerillas. A ceasefire was agreed upon by both parties and an election was called for and conducted with Robert Gabriel Mugabe emerging as the outright winner to assume the office of Prime Minister.

What eludes the minds of many is that Mugabe was not the first president of Zimbabwe. It was a homosexual clergyman by the name of the Reverend Canaan Sodindo Banana whose only memorable act was to introduce Zimbabweans to the world of alternative lifestyle. Naturally this was his downfall. Prime Minister Mugabe, who was in reality the true ruler, exposed Banana’s closet sexual deviations until the latter was officially thrown out through the State House window on the 31st of December 1987. While Mugabe was busy shooting down the President, a civil war was raging on in the south-western provinces of the young nation. This dichotomy of attack revealed Mugabe’s true nature; that of a man hell-bent on assuming power at all costs. The world largely ignored these early acts of truancy since they were still mesmerized by the erudition of the relatively young demagogue. The Queen of England even went as far as calling him a fine African gentleman! Perhaps she was right. A gentleman can still be a despot as much as a wolf can be considered as a type of dog.

The end of 1987 ushered in the black version of Dr Frankenstein’s monster. Unlike the literary monster who had no name, this black monster had a name; ZANU-PF, with Mugabe being Dr Frankenstein of course. 1987 was the year that Mugabe finally got what he had been fighting for since the 60’s – absolute power. The ceremonial President was deposed of with the help of the Intelligence Organisation, the only serious contender to the throne – Dr Joshua Nkomo (leader of the equally powerful ZAPU) – was forcibly assimilated into the communist matrix with the help of the Fifth Brigade and a one-party state was enforced on the 22nd of December 1987. The golden rule of Zimbabwean politics was written in stone on that day; if you dare touch Mugabe’s iron fist you’ll be crushed to death. A long list of names can be drawn from the pages of history of people who lost their lives for breaking this golden rule.

A brief perusal of the course of elections held in this tiny country right from its inception till date reveals a very consistent pattern which everyone can see but none can correct – the trail of violence. The man himself confirmed this at the turn of the millennium when he boasted that he had a PhD in Violence. All elections from 1980 right up to 2013 have been a farce. The people of Zimbabwe have never had a ‘free and fair’ election which is exactly how Mugabe wants it. He has always fed on fear and worship like a mythical Greek god. That is how he got to be where he is and that is also the reason why he can never be dethroned by anything less than a revolution. He actually has a lot of people who love him and worship him as much as he has people who hate him and fear him. All these people vote for him despite the reasons being disparate; whether it is out of fear or out of love and everything in between he will always win any election.

Can he be removed then? Most certainly!! The answer is very clear and even he has given us the answer over and over and over again. Only the people can remove him. This is where the problem lies. Who exactly are these ‘people’? They are not the voters of course because their vote have never amounted to anything. The ‘people’ are those who are ready to die for a cause. Those are the only ‘people’ Mugabe respects and fears – warriors. This explains why every dissenting voice is crushed even before they say what they are thinking. He knows what it takes to unite a people for a common cause. After all that is how he rose to power. Until these warriors organise themselves into a ‘people’ Mugabe will always be Mugabe. The 2018 elections are no different; there are no ‘people’ who are loud enough for his senile ears to hear and with the look of things none will follow.

 

BOOK REVIEW: NATURAL CAUSES by MICHAEL PALMER

If you have read any of Michael Palmer’s books and have an aversion to surprises then this book is perfect for you. Just like all the other works by the author the book follows the typical ‘hot-shot doctor who is framed for medical negligence and seeks revenge while falling unexpectedly in love’ plot.

The ‘hot shot’ doctor in this book is Sarah Baldwin a resident in Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the Medical Center of Boston who also has had impressive alternative medicine training. The hospital at which she works is ridiculed by a local newspaper columnist who has a vendetta against everything the hospital stands for; a blend of scientific and alternative medicine. Three patients die under exactly the same circumstances and the only connection among them is Sarah’s alternative medicine prescriptions. She seeks vengeance and pacification all the while falling in love with her attorney. The ending is as much surprising as it is heart-wrenching.

Michael Palmer, just like his rival Robin Cook, was an accomplished physician who blended his diverse medical knowledge with drama to produce multiple novels which have shaped the course of the medical thriller genre. It is difficult to analyse the author without comparing him with Cook just as it is exacting to review Isaac Asimov without collating his works with those of Arthur C. Clarke . All four however have oftentimes been caught up with the redundancy that bedevils serial writers.Natural Causes bares testimony to that. It is in itself a good thriller provided you have not read any of Palmer’s other books.

BOOK REVIEW: A FAREWELL TO ARMS – ERNEST HEMINGWAY

This is the first book I have read written by Hemingway. I decided to start with this particular piece because it is widely regarded as the one that  put this Nobel Prize winner on the literary map.

Published in 1929 the novel is about an American ‘Tenente’ (tenente being the Italian equivalent of Lieutenant) who endures and absconds the first World War. The title of the book serves as an artistic dual depiction of a soldier’s loss; arms of a woman and fire-arms. The plot is very simple but not so predictable; a soldier falls in love with a woman, loses faith in the war he is fighting and deserts the army to be with his lover.

The literary style is also simple; short sentences, limited vocabulary, short paragraphs and first-person narration. In fact it is Hemingway’s literary style that set him apart from his contemporaries especially James Joyce. Hemingway belonged to the ‘Beat Generation’ who adopted the simplistic prose which was at that time a new genre of literature. James Joyce on the other hand adopted the steam-of-consciousness style which was also revolutionary. It is safe to say most of today’s novelists make use of Hemingway’s literary style.

I could not help but notice the striking resemblance of the book’s protagonist with the author himself. Both served in the Italian army as ambulance drivers, both had an intimate relationship with alcohol and so forth. I have since learnt that this was in fact a conscious pattern which the author followed throughout his career.

I have only one problem with the book; the romance was downright childish. I found the romantic aspect of the book as a nonsensical distraction. The dialogue between the lieutenant and his lover, Catherine, was devoid of any depth or versatility. It sounded like this; ‘I love you’ and ‘I love you too’ – over and over and over again and nothing more. In my opinion the book would have been a much better read without the romantic aspect.

In conclusion I would say this is a book written by a respected author which can only pique the interest of those who know more about the author than his work. In other words if this book was to be published today it would just pass under the radar. However if one were to read the book with the preconceived perception of its significance in the history of literature then they would understand why Hemingway is the legend that he is.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: